Figure vs NEO
Figure is a humanoid robot by Figure AI (United States); NEO comes from 1X Technologies (United States). NEO is taller at 170 cm, against 168 cm for Figure. Figure is heavier: 60 kg versus 30 kg for NEO. NEO has more degrees of freedom (75 against 30). Figure is a prototype, while NEO is in pilot deployments. Listed prices: $130,000 for Figure and $20,000 for NEO.
Add up to two more robots or show only the rows that differ.
| Spec |   🇺🇸 United StatesPrototype |   🇺🇸 United StatesPilot |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Year | ||
| Year | 2025 | 2024 |
| Body | ||
| Height | ||
| Height | 168 cm | 170 cm |
| Weight | ||
| Weight | 60 kg | 30 kg |
| Degrees of freedom | ||
| Degrees of freedom | 30 | 75 |
| DoF (hands) | ||
| DoF (hands) | 20 | 22 |
| Fingers | ||
| Fingers | 10 | 10 |
| Structural material | ||
| Structural material | Battery enclosure uses stamped steel, die-cast aluminum, and structural adhesives | Soft 3D-lattice polymer body; machine-washable nylon suit/shoes. |
| Size | ||
| Size | - | Height 5’6”; Weight 66 lbs |
| Motion | ||
| Max speed | ||
| Max speed | 4.3 km/h | 22 km/h |
| Walking speed | ||
| Walking speed | 4.3 km/h | 5 km/h |
| Strength | ||
| Strength | 20 kg | 70 kg |
| Runtime | ||
| Runtime | 5 h | 4 h |
| Motor tech | ||
| Motor tech | Frameless BLDC-motors | Tendon-driven actuators; high torque-density motors |
| Gear tech | ||
| Gear tech | Strain-wave (harmonic) and/or cycloidal | Tendon-based transmissions |
| Sensing & Compute | ||
| CPU / GPU | ||
| CPU / GPU | Helix runs entirely on-board on dual low-power embedded GPUs | 1X NEO Cortex (NVIDIA Jetson Thor) |
| Operating system | ||
| Operating system | Ubuntu Linux (LTS) + RT-komponenter | - |
| LLM integration | ||
| LLM integration | Helix uses an open-source, open-weight VLM for high-level reasoning | Built-in LLM + Redwood AI vision-language model for learning & chores. |
| Camera | ||
| Camera | 03 introduces a new vision system with 2× frame rate, ¼ latency, and +60% FoV per camera, plus palm cameras in each hand. | Dual 8.85 MP stereo fisheye at 90 Hz |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | 10 Gbps mmWave data offload; wireless inductive charging and data offload | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 5G |
| Latency (glass → action) | ||
| Latency (glass → action) | No numeric “glass-to-action” latency published. Site notes ¼ camera latency vs. prior architecture and 200 Hz low-level control | teleop via app/VR is supported |
| Safety & Market | ||
| Safe with humans | ||
| Safe with humans | - | Yes |
| Ingress protection | ||
| Ingress protection | - | Hands IP68 (submersible); Body IP44 (splash-proof). |
| Primary market | ||
| Primary market | Home service, Industries | Consumer home use |
| Country | ||
| Country | United States | United States |
| Availability | ||
| Availability | Prototype | Pilot |
| Price | ||
| Price | $ 130 000 | $ 20 000 |
| Verified facts | ||
| Deployments | ||
| Deployments | 1 | - |
| Production records | ||
| Production records | 1 | 1 |
| All reviewed facts | ||
| All reviewed facts | 11 | 19 |
Counts of reviewed facts with sources. Open a robot page to see each fact and its links.
More comparisons
Figure vs OptimusFigure AI · Tesla
Figure vs IRONFigure AI · XPENG
Apollo vs FigureApptronik · Figure AI
Figure vs Walker S2Figure AI · UBTECH Robotics
Expedition A3 vs FigureAGIBOT · Figure AI- NEO vs Optimus1X Technologies · Tesla
- Expedition A3 vs NEOAGIBOT · 1X Technologies
H1 vs NEOUnitree Robotics · 1X Technologies