Atlas vs Expedition A3
Atlas is a humanoid robot by Boston Dynamics (United States); Expedition A3 comes from AGIBOT (China). Atlas is taller at 190 cm, against 175 cm for Expedition A3. Atlas is heavier: 90 kg versus 55 kg for Expedition A3. Atlas has more degrees of freedom (56 against 49). Both are in pilot deployments. Listed prices: $120,000 for Atlas and $45,000 for Expedition A3.
Add up to two more robots or show only the rows that differ.
| Spec | Atlas![]() 🇺🇸 United StatesPilot | Expedition A3![]() 🇨🇳 ChinaPilot |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Year | ||
| Year | 2013 | 2026 |
| Body | ||
| Height | ||
| Height | 190 cm | 175 cm |
| Weight | ||
| Weight | 90 kg | 55 kg |
| Degrees of freedom | ||
| Degrees of freedom | 56 | 49 |
| DoF (hands) | ||
| DoF (hands) | 13 | 125 |
| Fingers | ||
| Fingers | 3 | 5 |
| Structural material | ||
| Structural material | Titanium, aluminum components | Aerospace-grade Aluminum / Carbon Fiber |
| Color | ||
| Color | White, Blue | Silver / Black / White |
| Motion | ||
| Max speed | ||
| Max speed | 8 km/h | 7 km/h |
| Walking speed | ||
| Walking speed | 9 km/h | 7 km/h |
| Strength | ||
| Strength | 50 kg | 10 kg |
| Runtime | ||
| Runtime | 4 h | 8 h |
| Motor tech | ||
| Motor tech | Fully electric actuators | PowerFlow Integrated Joint (Quasi-direct drive) |
| Gear tech | ||
| Gear tech | Unspecified (likely harmonic or precision gear systems in joints) | Planetary Reducers (< 10 ratio) |
| Sensing & Compute | ||
| CPU / GPU | ||
| CPU / GPU | Not publicly specified (custom robot compute likely). Assumed advanced embedded robotics processors. | 200 TOPS AI Computing Power |
| Operating system | ||
| Operating system | Custom robotics OS with integration support | AimRT Framework / Linux-based |
| LLM integration | ||
| LLM integration | Not officially confirmed; partnerships with DeepMind suggest future AI integration | WorkGPT (Multimodal Large Model) |
| Camera | ||
| Camera | Not officially detailed; 360° vision system | RGB-D Cameras + Fisheye Cameras |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | enterprise integration (Orbit software), Wi‑Fi | 5G, Ethernet, Wi‑Fi |
| Tactile / force sensors | ||
| Tactile / force sensors | tactile feedback | - |
| Latency (glass → action) | ||
| Latency (glass → action) | Not publicly available; robotics systems optimized for real-time motion | Low-latency |
| Safety & Market | ||
| Safe with humans | ||
| Safe with humans | Yes | Yes |
| Ingress protection | ||
| Ingress protection | IP67 | - |
| Primary market | ||
| Primary market | Industrial automation, logistics, Manufacturing | Commercial Service, Entertainment, retail |
| Country | ||
| Country | United States | China |
| Availability | ||
| Availability | Pilot | Pilot |
| Price | ||
| Price | $ 120 000 | $ 45 000 |
| Verified facts | ||
| Deployments | ||
| Deployments | 1 | 1 |
| All reviewed facts | ||
| All reviewed facts | 16 | 2 |
Counts of reviewed facts with sources. Open a robot page to see each fact and its links.
More comparisons

Atlas vs OptimusBoston Dynamics · Tesla
Atlas vs DigitBoston Dynamics · Agility Robotics
Apollo vs AtlasApptronik · Boston Dynamics
Atlas vs Walker S1Boston Dynamics · UBTECH Robotics
4NE-1 vs AtlasNEURA Robotics · Boston Dynamics
Atlas vs GalbotBoston Dynamics · Galbot
Expedition A3 vs OptimusAGIBOT · Tesla
Apollo vs Expedition A3Apptronik · AGIBOT

