Unlocking Scalable Robot Learning in the Real World–Karl Pertsch (UC Berkeley and Stanford)
Karl Pertsch, a postdoctoral researcher at UC Berkeley and Stanford, discusses building scalable, generalist robot-learning systems with collaborators across the robotics community.
In this talk
- 1:00
Why robot learning needs to scale
Pertsch contrasts general-purpose AI models with robot policies that can act in the physical world. Existing robot policies can perform complex tasks, but often need task-specific data and are brittle to changes such as lighting or camera position. He proposes combining diverse robot data with high-capacity models to build policies that can handle more tasks and environments.
- 7:07
Building shared robot datasets
Pertsch describes DROID, a community effort that collected about 70,000 teleoperated episodes across roughly 560 scenes and 80 tasks, including in people’s homes. He also co-led Open X-Embodiment, which pooled more than a million episodes across 22 robot embodiments. Sharing and reusing data lets researchers build on existing collections instead of starting from scratch for each project.
- 13:45
Designing policies for dexterous control
Pertsch traces work from modular policies such as Octo to OpenVLA, an open-source vision-language-action model trained on pooled robot data. Standard action tokenization struggled with fast, dexterous tasks because it produced long sequences of repetitive, low-information tokens. FAST uses discrete cosine transform compression to shorten action sequences; Pertsch reports over tenfold compression on some tasks and faster training for π₀-FAST than the original π₀. A fine-tuned policy also made reasonable attempts at new tabletop tasks on DROID robots without further in-lab training.
- 34:13
Making robot evaluation more reproducible
Real-world robot evaluations are slow and difficult to reproduce, so Pertsch and colleagues explored simulation as a scalable alternative. Across eight environments, simulated success rates reflected real-world performance better than validation loss did. More realistic visuals improved evaluation reliability, while changing physics parameters or simulators made little difference on the static pick-and-place tasks they studied. The environments still require manual work and do not cover every task.
- 42:51
Limits and next research directions
Pertsch says current policies still struggle with unfamiliar objects, dexterous tasks, reliability, and safety. He identifies opportunities to combine robot data with internet-trained models, learn dexterous skills from human video or simulation, and make policies easier to teach through natural-language or visual feedback. In the Q&A, he notes that zero-shot success rates around 50% to 80% fall short of the reliability needed for real applications, and suggests reinforcement learning could help policies improve on the job.
Briefs summarise talks and interviews; timestamps open the video at that moment. Claims in a talk are the speaker's own.